WEDNESDAY, Aug. 5 (HealthDay News) — U.S. spending on mental illness is soaring at a faster pace than spending on any other health care category, new government data released Wednesday shows.
The cost of treating mental disorders rose sharply between 1996 and 2006, from $35 billion (in 2006 dollars) to almost $58 billion, according to the report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
At the same time, the report showed, the number of Americans who sought treatment for depression, bipolar disorder and other mental health woes almost doubled, from 19 million to 36 million.
The new statistics come on the heels of a study, released Monday, that found antidepressant use among U.S. residents almost doubled between a similar time frame, 1996 and 2005.
Spending on mental illness showed a faster rate of growth over the 10-year period analyzed than costs for heart disease, cancer, trauma-linked disorders, and asthma.
According to the report, spending on heart disease rose from $72 billion in 1996 to $78 billion in 2006; cancer care rose from $47 billion to $58 billion; asthma costs climbed from $36 billion to $51 billion, and expenditures for trauma-related care rose from $46 billion to $68 billion.
In terms of per-patient costs, cancer led the way at $5,178 in 2006 (up slightly from $5,067 in 1996), while costs for trauma care and asthma rose sharply — from $1,220 to $1,953 and from $863 to $1,059, respectively.
On the other hand, average per-patient spending for heart conditions fell, from $4,333 to $3,964. And spending on mental disorders declined from $1,825 to $1,591.
In the Monday study, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, researchers reported that 10.12 percent of U.S. residents aged 6 and over, or 27 million people, were using antidepressants in 2005, compared to 5.84 percent, or 13.3 million people, in 1996.
The increase seemed to span virtually all demographic groups.
“This is a 20-year trend and it’s very powerful,” remarked Dr. Eric Caine, chair of the department of psychiatry and co-director of the Center for the Study of Prevention of Suicide at the University of Rochester Medical Center.
More information
For information on mental health issues, head to the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
— E.J. Mundell
SOURCES: Aug. 5, 2009, news release, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; August 2009, Archives of General Psychiatry; Eric Caine, M.D., chair, department of psychiatry, and co-director, Center for the Study of Prevention of Suicide, University of Rochester Medical Center, N.Y.
Last Updated: Aug. 06, 2009
Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Showing posts with label Bipolar Disorder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bipolar Disorder. Show all posts
FDA Panel OKs Newer Antipsychotics for Children
WEDNESDAY, June 10 (HealthDay News) — A U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel on Wednesday voted overwhelmingly that Seroquel and Zyprexa, two powerful antipsychotic drugs, be approved to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in children aged 13 to 17.
The panel also handed down a decision on Geodon, a third antipsychotic in the same class. They found that drug to be safe and effective for the treatment of bipolar mania in children aged 10 to 17.
All three drugs are part of the new-generation “atypical” antipsychotics, currently approved for adult use. The medications have been prescribed “off-label” by many doctors for years to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in children ages 10 to 17, despite possible serious side effects, including diabetes and heart woes.
Seroquel is made by drug maker AstraZeneca. pharmaceutical giant Lilly makes Zyprexa, and Geodon is made by Pfizer.
There is a pressing need for effective antipsychotics for children, one expert noted.
“Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are very real illnesses, which collectively affect between 1 percent and 3 percent of all young people,” noted Dr. David Fassler, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of Vermont College of Medicine, who testified before the panel Tuesday. “Without treatment, children have problems at school, at home, and with their friends. They’re also at increased risk of accidents, hospitalization, and death at an early age from multiple causes, including suicide.”
And yet safety concerns plague many of these drugs. In 2004, the FDA ordered AstraZeneca to add a special “black box” warning to Seroquel’s packaging, outlining increased risks of hyperglycemia, high blood pressure and diabetes associated with use of the drug. Also, older patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with Seroquel are at an increased risk of death, according to the FDA.
And in a unanimous vote in early April, an FDA advisory panel determined that Seroquel should not be approved as first-line therapy for adult depression, because of continued questions about its safety profile — most notably, a link to higher risk for sudden cardiac death. However, the drug was approved for use in patients for whom other antidepressants didn’t work.
The family of atypical antipsychotics has other well-documented potential side effects, including weight gain and high blood sugar, which can increase the risk of diabetes, as well as rapid heart beat, difficulty sleeping and trouble concentrating.
Ronald T. Brown, dean and professor of public health at Temple University Health Sciences Center, testified before the panel Tuesday. Speaking to HealthDay, he said there’s still too little known about the efficacy and side effects of these medications in children for the FDA to approve their use in kids.
“The problems are what we don’t know rather than what we do know,” Brown said. “We don’t know anything about the long-term effects of these medications; they have only been through a six-week trial.”
“I am not convinced about the long-term safety of these drugs,” he added.
“Particularly with children, when you don’t know, I don’t think you should approve it,” Brown said. “In this country, we are very over-zealous to approve drugs. I think we need to be more conservative, particularly because this is a pediatric population.”
Brown believes off-label use may be safe, because it is done for particular patients, with the family’s consent. “That’s a lot different than saying this drug has been approved for children and adolescents,” he said.
Prior studies have also found that these newer drugs are no more effective than older medications. Their main advantage is that they do not cause the tremors and muscle spasms associated with older agents.
Diana Zuckerman is president of the National Research Center for Women & Families, a Washington, DC advocacy group. She believes much more study is needed before good decisions can be made as to the use of these antipsychotics by youngsters.
According to Zuckerman, the small studies that are out there suggest that, while on these drugs, “between 20 to 30 percent of kids were gaining weight, heart rates were increased, many of the kids were so knocked out (‘sedated’) that they could barely function.”
Overall, the trials submitted to the FDA panel were small, Zuckerman added, noting there were “usually less than 100 at a specific dosage.”
“If you want to prove that the benefits outweigh the risks,” she said, “it is necessary to study thousands of kids for at least a year in double-blind studies, preferably longer. These studies don’t come close to doing that.”
Fassler took a more measured view.
“None of these medications should be used without careful consideration of the risks and benefits,” he said. “Children and adolescents taking these medications should be monitored closely for evidence of significant side effects or adverse reactions. Nonetheless, when used appropriately, these medications can be a helpful and effective component of treatment for children and adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.”
In any case, drugs should never be viewed as the only therapeutic option open to young patients, according to Fassler.
“Medication, including the atypical antipsychotics, can be helpful to control some of the signs and symptoms associated with these disorders, but medication alone is rarely an adequate or sufficient intervention. It should only be used as part of a comprehensive treatment plan, individualized to the needs of the child and family,” Fassler said.
Although the FDA isn’t required to follow advisory committee recommendations, it usually does.
More information
For more information on atypical antipsychotics, visit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration .
By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter
SOURCES: David Fassler, M.D., clinical professor of psychiatry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington; Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., president, National Research Center for Women & Families, Washington, DC; Ronald T. Brown, Ph.D., dean and professor of public health, Temple University Health Sciences Center, Philadelphia; June 10, 2009 statement, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Last Updated: June 10, 2009
Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
The panel also handed down a decision on Geodon, a third antipsychotic in the same class. They found that drug to be safe and effective for the treatment of bipolar mania in children aged 10 to 17.
All three drugs are part of the new-generation “atypical” antipsychotics, currently approved for adult use. The medications have been prescribed “off-label” by many doctors for years to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in children ages 10 to 17, despite possible serious side effects, including diabetes and heart woes.
Seroquel is made by drug maker AstraZeneca. pharmaceutical giant Lilly makes Zyprexa, and Geodon is made by Pfizer.
There is a pressing need for effective antipsychotics for children, one expert noted.
“Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are very real illnesses, which collectively affect between 1 percent and 3 percent of all young people,” noted Dr. David Fassler, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of Vermont College of Medicine, who testified before the panel Tuesday. “Without treatment, children have problems at school, at home, and with their friends. They’re also at increased risk of accidents, hospitalization, and death at an early age from multiple causes, including suicide.”
And yet safety concerns plague many of these drugs. In 2004, the FDA ordered AstraZeneca to add a special “black box” warning to Seroquel’s packaging, outlining increased risks of hyperglycemia, high blood pressure and diabetes associated with use of the drug. Also, older patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with Seroquel are at an increased risk of death, according to the FDA.
And in a unanimous vote in early April, an FDA advisory panel determined that Seroquel should not be approved as first-line therapy for adult depression, because of continued questions about its safety profile — most notably, a link to higher risk for sudden cardiac death. However, the drug was approved for use in patients for whom other antidepressants didn’t work.
The family of atypical antipsychotics has other well-documented potential side effects, including weight gain and high blood sugar, which can increase the risk of diabetes, as well as rapid heart beat, difficulty sleeping and trouble concentrating.
Ronald T. Brown, dean and professor of public health at Temple University Health Sciences Center, testified before the panel Tuesday. Speaking to HealthDay, he said there’s still too little known about the efficacy and side effects of these medications in children for the FDA to approve their use in kids.
“The problems are what we don’t know rather than what we do know,” Brown said. “We don’t know anything about the long-term effects of these medications; they have only been through a six-week trial.”
“I am not convinced about the long-term safety of these drugs,” he added.
“Particularly with children, when you don’t know, I don’t think you should approve it,” Brown said. “In this country, we are very over-zealous to approve drugs. I think we need to be more conservative, particularly because this is a pediatric population.”
Brown believes off-label use may be safe, because it is done for particular patients, with the family’s consent. “That’s a lot different than saying this drug has been approved for children and adolescents,” he said.
Prior studies have also found that these newer drugs are no more effective than older medications. Their main advantage is that they do not cause the tremors and muscle spasms associated with older agents.
Diana Zuckerman is president of the National Research Center for Women & Families, a Washington, DC advocacy group. She believes much more study is needed before good decisions can be made as to the use of these antipsychotics by youngsters.
According to Zuckerman, the small studies that are out there suggest that, while on these drugs, “between 20 to 30 percent of kids were gaining weight, heart rates were increased, many of the kids were so knocked out (‘sedated’) that they could barely function.”
Overall, the trials submitted to the FDA panel were small, Zuckerman added, noting there were “usually less than 100 at a specific dosage.”
“If you want to prove that the benefits outweigh the risks,” she said, “it is necessary to study thousands of kids for at least a year in double-blind studies, preferably longer. These studies don’t come close to doing that.”
Fassler took a more measured view.
“None of these medications should be used without careful consideration of the risks and benefits,” he said. “Children and adolescents taking these medications should be monitored closely for evidence of significant side effects or adverse reactions. Nonetheless, when used appropriately, these medications can be a helpful and effective component of treatment for children and adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.”
In any case, drugs should never be viewed as the only therapeutic option open to young patients, according to Fassler.
“Medication, including the atypical antipsychotics, can be helpful to control some of the signs and symptoms associated with these disorders, but medication alone is rarely an adequate or sufficient intervention. It should only be used as part of a comprehensive treatment plan, individualized to the needs of the child and family,” Fassler said.
Although the FDA isn’t required to follow advisory committee recommendations, it usually does.
More information
For more information on atypical antipsychotics, visit the U.S. Food and Drug Administration .
By Steven Reinberg
HealthDay Reporter
SOURCES: David Fassler, M.D., clinical professor of psychiatry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington; Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., president, National Research Center for Women & Families, Washington, DC; Ronald T. Brown, Ph.D., dean and professor of public health, Temple University Health Sciences Center, Philadelphia; June 10, 2009 statement, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Last Updated: June 10, 2009
Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




